Ethical Pulse - from the Ethical Junction membership

Posts Tagged ‘UK’

Changing the Way the UK produce Energy – Allen & York Interview Paul Hinds, Head of Sustainability at Natural England

Monday, June 6th, 2011

Chris Huhne announced in May, a UK wide commitment to halving carbon emissions by 2025, from 1990 levels, along with plans to radically change the way that the country produces energy, reports the BBC.[1] This announcement makes the UK the first country in the world to have declared a “legally binding” target on greenhouse gas emissions beyond 2020.

Part of these plans involves the UK having to cut carbon emissions in half by 2027.  Allen & York have explored how this is being put into practice by organisations around the UK.  Their in-depth interview with Paul Hinds, the Head of Sustainability at Natural England, outlines how they went about reducing their carbon emissions of its business travel and estate by 50% by the end of 2010.

Questions we asked Paul Hinds

1) What factors have leaded you to the desire and action of decreasing carbon emissions by 50%?

2) What do you believe the long term impacts on Natural England will be as a result of reducing carbon emissions by 50%?

3) As the Head of Sustainability, have you had experience of reducing carbon emissions within business by a significant amount before?

4) How will you reduce carbon emissions by 50% at Natural England?

5) What is the process involved in reducing carbon by 50% at Natural England, for example how long have you been working at this?

6) Are you on target so far?

A&Y: What factors have leaded you to the desire and action of decreasing carbon emissions by 50%?

PH: The organisation was formed in 2006 to be the adviser to the Government on the natural environment.  As an advocate of mitigating carbon we felt we had to ‘walk the walk’ as well as ‘talk the talk’ hence we set a very ambitious target.  We also wanted to demonstrate that carbon could be reduced without the need to either offset or pass on the carbon burden to our customers, stakeholders or employees.  We also wanted to demonstrate that carbon reduction brings significant financial benefits as well as productivity and work-life balance benefits to our staff.

A&Y: What do you believe the long term impacts on Natural England would be as a result of reducing carbon by 50%?

PH: We have instilled a ‘low carbon culture’ in the organisation whereby everyone now questions the carbon costs of decisions and actions in much the same way as they would consider the financial costs.  As a result we take a more balanced approached to how we do our business but continue to maintain our levels of customer service.  Whilst this is a hugely significant achievement, it is the first step towards the agency being a truly sustainable organisation.  We are now looking at the environmental impact of our suppliers, commuting, waste etc. and will be setting targets later in the year.

A&Y: As The Head of Sustainability, have you had experience of reducing carbon emissions with business by a significant amount before?

PH: I have previously worked for organisations and led partnerships with carbon reduction goals, but nowhere near as ambitious as 50%.  This is what attracted me to the job in the first place, particularly as most of my peers at the time thought I was setting myself up to fail!  Prior to joining Natural England I was more involved in the strategic development and influencing side of environmental management, both working with collaborations between private business and the public sector as well as lobbying within Whitehall.  The job offered me the opportunity to show that, like Natural England, I could both ‘walk the walk’ as well as ‘talk the talk’.  On a personal level I have reduced my carbon footprint by well over 50% as a result of cycling and using public transport more and becoming much more energy conscious around my home (despite 3 kids with a fascination for light switches!)

A&Y: How will you reduce carbon emissions by 50% at Natural England?

PH: Through a combination of energy efficiency and ‘right-sizing’ our offices, giving ownership of carbon to our staff whilst providing them with the support and tools needed to work in more sustainable ways and strong leadership from our senior decision makers. My role has been very much about facilitating these programmes of work which has varied from rolling up my sleeves and pouring over endless spreadsheets of data to presenting to the Board.  To use a football analogy it has been very much a ‘Player manager’ role with me both managing people to deliver whilst also delivering myself.

A&Y: What is the process involved in reducing carbon by 50% at Natural England, for example how long have you been working at this?

PH: There is no distinct step by step process in the delivery as a lot of things have to be delivered concurrently.  However, for us, the most important area was getting the data right – both the methodology and the timings by which we report our carbon emissions.  This was important for two main reasons;

1. Because we are an ‘evidence based’ organisation with lots of very clever people who immediately challenge any data they don’t feel is right

2. We wanted our staff to ‘own’ as much of their carbon footprint as possible, so accurate and regular reporting on how successful they were in reducing their carbon footprint was essential in order to maintain buy-in.

If we couple this with the commitment of our senior management team to reduce their own individual travel carbon footprints (thereby showing that we are all in it together) with the organisational dialogue we have created with our staff, then we have created a strong base on which to achieve our savings.

Our methodology follows Defra’s published guidance and uses its emission factors and is accredited to the Carbon Trust Standard and has been audited by PwC. We use utility bill data to calculate and monitor our estate energy carbon emissions, but have begun to move over to real time monitoring of our offices

The largest proportion of our 2007 footprint and the biggest opportunity for carbon saving has been through improving the energy performance of our estate.  We have closed and moved from inefficient offices to more sustainable locations and also encouraged our staff to realise the work-life balance benefits of flexible working and touchdown centres rather than commuting to a Natural England office on a daily basis.

We have established a system that quantifies the emissions of working at home to ensure that we are not passing on the carbon burden to our staff when working in a flexible way and we are supporting staff in improving the energy efficiency of their homes by providing advice on insulation, behavioural change and grants.

A&Y: Are you on target so far?

PH: We have already made considerable progress with a 48% reduction (as of the beginning of December 2010) and plans to ensure we meet the target by mid-January 2011.  Our office energy efficiency programme and rationalisation of inefficient estate has reduced our working office carbon footprint by just under 44% as of November 2010 with an estimated annual utilities cost saving of £380,000 (against our 2007 baseline).

During the first year of implementation (2009-10) the Natural England travel carbon footprint fell by just under 23%.

Our thanks to Paul Hinds and if you are interested in taking part in our series of Sustainability Industry Leader Interviews please email – our Communications Team

Allen & York are a leading international Sustainability Recruitment consultancy, offering jobs in Environment, CSR & Sustainability, Renewable Energy and Carbon Management, plus Health and Safety Management. Please visit their website at: www.allen-york.com

Allen & York is an active member of Ethical Junction, learn more

Car makers are going green but British motorists are not, shows new European study

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

Car makers are being forced to make significant cuts in their
vehicles’ CO2 emissions, but some countries appear reluctant to
buy the greenest models – British motorists languish at sixteenth
place in a league table of who buys the most polluting models in
Europe, according to a study carried out on behalf of the
Environmental Transport Association (ETA).

Portuguese drivers are the greenest in Europe when it comes to
buying cars with an average CO2 rate of 138g/km
(eg. VW Polo) – the least green motorists are from Latvia
with a figure of 177g/km (eg. Suburu Imprezza). The average British
driver comes sixteenth in the list with 158g/km (eg. VW Passat).

EU regulation is striving to cut the CO2 emitted by cars to an
average figure of 130 g/km by 2015.

Director at the ETA, Andrew Davis, said: “Car makers can build green
cars, but they need us to buy them. The report found that strict new
emissions laws are having a strong effect on the availability of
cleaner cars, but wealth, motoring taxes, fuel prices and consumer
attitudes, which vary wildly from country to country across Europe,
have much more of an effect on how clean a car is chosen.”

 ”There was a fuss in Britain when road tax increased for the
most-polluting cars, but we are lax by European standards – we need
a more sophisticated carrot and stick approach to encouraging people
to drive lighter cars if we want to do better in next year’s league
table.”

League table results:

Ranking 2008. Country/Average CO2 2008(g/km)/AverageCO2 2007/Rank 2007

1.      Portugal / 138 / 144 / 1
2.      France / 140 / 149 / 4
3.      Italy / 145 / 147 / 2
4.      Denmark / 146 / 160 / 12
5.      Malta / 147 / 148 / 3
6.      Belgium / 148 / 153 / 5
7.      Spain / 148 / 153 / 6
8.      Poland / 153 / 154 / 7
9.      Hungary / 153 / 155 / 10
10.     Czech Republic / 154 / 154 / 8
11.     Slovenia / 156 / 156 / 11
12.     Romania / 156 / 155 / 9
13.     Ireland / 157 / 162 / 13
14.     Netherlands / 158 / 165 / 15
15.     Austria / 158 / 163 / 16
16.     Great Britain / 158 / 165 / 16
17.     Luxembourg / 160 / 166 / 18
18.     Greece / 161 / 165 / 17
19.     Finland / 163 / 165 / 22
20.     Germany / 165 / 169 / 19
21.     Cyprus / 166 / 170 / 20
22.     Lithuania / 170 / 177 / 21
23.     Sweden / 174 / 181 / 23
24.     Estonia / 177 / 182 / 24
25.     Latvia / 181 / 183

Car makers – Ranking by average CO2 in 2008

Ranking in 2008. Manufacturer/ranking 2007/ Average CO2 in 2008(g/km)

1.      Fiat/ 2 / 138
2.      Peugeot-Citroen / 1 / 139
3.      Renault / 3 / 143
4.      Toyota / 4 / 147
5.      Hyundai / 7 / 149
6.      Ford / 8 / 152
7.      GM / 5 / 153
8.      Honda / 6 / 154
9.      BMW / 12 / 154
10.     Suzuki / 9 / 156
11.     Mazda / 13 / 158
12.     VW / 10 / 159
13.     Nissan / 11 / 161
14.     Daimler / 14 / 175


WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera